Passive screen
Scrolling, autoplay video, waiting with a tablet as a pacifier. This is the kind linked to attention and mood problems.
With your consent we use cookies for analytics, handling your enquiry and measuring our ads on Facebook and Instagram.
We use cookies to analyse traffic on our website and understand how you use it — so that we can make it better. We also link your visit with the enquiry you send us, in our CRM system, so that we can answer your questions properly. With your consent we also use the Meta Pixel to measure how well our ads on Facebook and Instagram work. We never sell your data.
Giving consent is voluntary. Without it the site works normally — we store only what is necessary for it to run. You can change or withdraw your consent at any time in the Privacy policy.
About two hours of focused, adaptive work with the learning platform in the morning — and an afternoon that is deliberately screen-free: projects, movement, people. Less passive screen time than in many traditional schools, where screens fill both lessons and breaks.
Reviewed August 2026
Research on children and screens keeps pointing to the same distinction: passive consumption is the problem, active creation and practice are not. The question worth asking any school is not “are there screens?” but “what is the child doing on them, and who is watching?”
Scrolling, autoplay video, waiting with a tablet as a pacifier. This is the kind linked to attention and mood problems.
Solving, writing, getting instant feedback, correcting. The child works; the screen responds. This is what the learning block is.
The whole afternoon: workshops, building, sport, conversations, performances. Knowledge leaves the screen and enters the hands.
The block is not two hours of staring. It is short focus cycles with breaks, at the child’s own level, with a teacher in the room the whole time.